Zapata v. California
377 U.S. 406, 84 S. Ct. 1633
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zapata v. California, 377 U.S. 406, 84 S. Ct. 1633 (1964).
377 U.S. 406 (Zapata v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McFarland v. English
111 F. Supp. 2d 591 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2000)
State v. Carrion-Collazo
534 A.2d 21 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Estelle v. Williams
425 U.S. 501 (Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Lamont S. Carter, United States of America v. Jerome R. Patterson, United States of America v. Jerome R. Patterson
522 F.2d 666 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
Wright v. Texas
415 F. Supp. 5 (E.D. Texas, 1975)
Frank M. Gaito, C-7482 v. Joseph R. Brierley
485 F.2d 86 (Third Circuit, 1973)
Donald A. Bentley, Jr. v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of Montana State Prison, and the State of Montana
469 F.2d 854 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
People v. Harris
17 Cal. App. 3d 388 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
People v. Borrero
227 N.E.2d 18 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Louis R. Hutcherson v. United States
345 F.2d 964 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)