Zapata, Ex Parte Valdemar

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 26, 2005
DocketAP-75,074
StatusPublished

This text of Zapata, Ex Parte Valdemar (Zapata, Ex Parte Valdemar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zapata, Ex Parte Valdemar, (Tex. 2005).

Opinion





IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,074

EX PARTE VALDEMAR ZAPATA, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NUMBER 2003-CR-0866 IN THE 144TH JUDICIAL

DISTRICT COURT BEXAR COUNTY

Per Curiam.



O P I N I O N



This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, Section 3 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation with intent to aggravated assault, a first-degree felony offense. Applicant's sentence was assessed at ten years' confinement. Applicant did not perfect an appeal.

In the instant application, Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal because his trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal following the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial.

The trial court has found that Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. We agree. Applicant is granted the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal from his conviction in sentence in cause number 2003-CR-0866 from the 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. Applicant is ordered returned to that point in time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to see that a written notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.

DELIVERED: January 26, 2005

DO NOT PUBLISH



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zapata, Ex Parte Valdemar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zapata-ex-parte-valdemar-texcrimapp-2005.