Zaparyniuk v. Comcowich

9 Conn. Super. Ct. 523
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 30, 1941·No. File No. 60849·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

While paragraph one sufficiently alleges a consideration this does not bar the defendant from asking its particular nature. One of the expressed purposes of the statute (Gen. Stat. [1930] § 5513) is to provide for "fuller and more particular statements."

The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zaparyniuk v. Comcowich, 9 Conn. Super. Ct. 523 (Colo. Ct. App. 1941).

9 Conn. Super. Ct. 523 (Zaparyniuk v. Comcowich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyers v. C. I. T. Corp.
12 Conn. Supp. 207 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Meyers v. C. I. T. Corporation
12 Conn. Super. Ct. 207 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1943)