Zapanta (Archie) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 2019·No. 79046·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ARCHIE SARMIENTO ZAPANTA, No. 79046 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

MED AUG 2 3 2019 ELI BROWN CLEW ..E.ME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPUTY CLERK

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.

Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to voluntary dismiss this appeal. Counsel advises this court that he has informed appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever waived. Having been so informed, appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

Pie/id P J.

Pickering

451'

12'61111.1"17J7

Parraguirre Cadish

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA / 9. S 5-370

(0) I947A 4441PD

I

cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk Archie Sarniiento Zapanta

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zapanta (Archie) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Zapanta (Archie) Vs. State (Zapanta (Archie) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 34.726
Nevada § 34.726