Home/Supreme Court/Zap v. United States

Zap v. United States

330 U.S. 800
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 3, 1947
DocketNo. 489
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 330 U.S. 800 (Zap v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zap v. United States, 330 U.S. 800 (1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing and to recall the mandate is granted. The second petition for rehearing is granted and the judgment entered June 10, 1946, 328 U. S. 624, and order denying rehearing entered October 21, 1946, 329 U. S. 824, are vacated. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the indictment. Ballard v. United States, 329 [801]*801U. S. 187. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Morris Lavine for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Washington, W. Marvin Smith, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brian H. Herschfus v. City of Oak Park, Mich.
Sixth Circuit, 2025
State of Iowa v. Brent Alan Hauge
Supreme Court of Iowa, 2022
People v. Woods
981 P.2d 1019 (California Supreme Court, 1999)
People v. Miller
345 N.E.2d 1 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Smith
193 A.2d 778 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Ex parte Danziger
77 F. Supp. 466 (S.D. California, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 U.S. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zap-v-united-states-scotus-1947.