Zantzinger v. Ketch
4 U.S. 115
This text of 4 U.S. 115 (Zantzinger v. Ketch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zantzinger v. Ketch, 4 U.S. 115 (1793).
Opinion
however, upon the authority of Hurst v. Fell, admitted the evidence, though with great reluctance; and declaring that they would reserve the point. But as the verdict was for the full amount of the plaintiff’s demand, the question was not revived.
This cause was tried at Carlisle nisi Shippen and Bradford, Justices. prius, on the 15th of May 1793, before
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zantzinger-v-ketch-pa-1793.