Zant v. Wentworth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Zant v. Wentworth

289 S.E.2d 763, 249 Ga. 244, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 1128

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 6, 1982

Docket38451

StatusPublished

This text of 289 S.E.2d 763 (Zant v. Wentworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zant v. Wentworth, 289 S.E.2d 763, 249 Ga. 244, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 1128 (Ga. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

The appellee in this case filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, seeking to set aside his convictions and sentences for burglary and theft by taking on grounds that his waiver of counsel and guilty plea were not knowing and voluntary.

The habeas judge agreed and, therefore, ruled in the appellee’s favor. See Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U. S. 63 (97 SC 1621, 52 LE2d [245]*245136) (1977). We find the habeas judge’s findings of fact to be supported by the evidence, and we can not say that he erred in entering the order from which this appeal is taken. See e.g., Johnson v. State, 233 Ga. 58 (209 SE2d 629) (1974). See generally Crawford v. Caldwell, 229 Ga. 809 (194 SE2d 470) (1972).

Decided April 6, 1982. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Mary Beth Westmore-land, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Robert Wentworth, pro se.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI