Home/New York Court of Appeals/Zanki v. Cahill

Zanki v. Cahill

812 N.E.2d 1257, 2 N.Y.3d 783, 780 N.Y.S.2d 307, 2 N.Y. 783, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1037
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 11, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 812 N.E.2d 1257 (Zanki v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zanki v. Cahill, 812 N.E.2d 1257, 2 N.Y.3d 783, 780 N.Y.S.2d 307, 2 N.Y. 783, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1037 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the alleged injuries resulted from a dangerous recurring condition of which defendant Cushman & Wakefield had actual or constructive notice.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldberg v. City of New York
2026 NY Slip Op 30667(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Ohadi v. Magnetic Constr. Group Corp.
2020 NY Slip Op 2278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Maldonado v. New York City Housing Authority
2016 NY Slip Op 8205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Quintana v. TCR, Tennis Club of Riverdale, Inc.
118 A.D.3d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Mantzoutsos v. 150 Street Produce Corp.
76 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Raghu v. New York City Housing Authority
72 A.D.3d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Acunia v. New York City Department of Education
68 A.D.3d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Morgan v. Windham Realty, LLC
68 A.D.3d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Santiago v. City of New York
61 A.D.3d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Johnson v. Samuel
15 A.D.3d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 N.E.2d 1257, 2 N.Y.3d 783, 780 N.Y.S.2d 307, 2 N.Y. 783, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zanki-v-cahill-ny-2004.