Zani v. Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Zani v. Social Security Administration

323 F. App'x 286

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 23, 2009

DocketNo. 08-8147

StatusPublished

This text of 323 F. App'x 286 (Zani v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zani v. Social Security Administration, 323 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert J. Zani seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Zani seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925, 927 (4th Cir.1986) (noting that transfers under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a), 1406(b) (2006) are interlocutory and therefore not appealable). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert J. Zani seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Zani seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925, 927 (4th Cir.1986) (noting that transfers under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a), 1406(b) (2006) are interlocutory and therefore not appealable). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 F. App'x 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zani-v-social-security-administration-ca4-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack