Zangerle v. State ex rel. Walther

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 381
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zangerle v. State ex rel. Walther. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 Ohio St. 168
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1926·No. No. 19496·Published

Opinion

JONES J.

1. Under Section 14, Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, the compensation of common pleas judges can neither be increased nor deminished during their term, and if once fixed it cannot be denied; nor does such compensation vary with the amount of service rendered by the occupant of the office.

2. The provisions of that section require that such judges shall receive the compensation provided by law at “stated times,” and not at times depending upon procurement of the approval of another official.

3. Section 2252, General Code, providing that such compensation shall be paid quarterly from the county treasury, is a valid legislative act; but the clause in Section 1558, General Code, (110 OL. 52) requiring the approval of the Chief Justice as a prerequisite to the issuance of a warrant by the county auditor, is constitutionally invalid.

Judgment affirmed.

Matthias, Day, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur; Marshall, C. J., and Allen, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zangerle v. State ex rel. Walther, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 381 (Ohio 1926).

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 381 (Zangerle v. State ex rel. Walther) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.