Zanfretti v. Kenebel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Zanfretti v. Kenebel

26 Misc. 839, 57 N.Y.S. 94

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Misc. 839 (Zanfretti v. Kenebel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zanfretti v. Kenebel, 26 Misc. 839, 57 N.Y.S. 94 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Leventritt, J.

There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The appellant invokes a substitution of our judgment for that of the trial justice respecting the weight of evidence. The plaintiff's claim was established by convincing proof. To the extent that the defendant presented satisfactory evidence of his counterclaim, it was allowed and the plaintiff's recovery correspondingly reduced. The record disclosed only positive assertion, emphatic denial and direct contradiction.

In that situation we cannot interfere, as the disposition of the issues was eminently just.

Judgment must be affirmed.

Fbeeuman, P. J., and MaoLean, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI