Zanes v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zanes v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 678
United States Customs Court·Decided August 8, 1960·No. No. 64434; protests 832276-G, etc. (Galveston and New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co. Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zanes v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 233 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 233 (Zanes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)