Zanelli v. JMM Raceway, LLC

83 A.D.3d 697, 919 N.Y.S.2d 878
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 5, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 697 (Zanelli v. JMM Raceway, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zanelli v. JMM Raceway, LLC, 83 A.D.3d 697, 919 N.Y.S.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J), entered June 7, 2010, as denied her motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corporation, upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corporation (hereinafter the defendant), upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint. Considering the lack of any prejudice to the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s relatively short delay in answering, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court properly excused the defendant’s delay in answering (see Giha v Giannos Enters., Inc., 69 AD3d 564, 565 [2010]; Stuart v Kushner, 39 AD3d 535, 536 [2007]; Harcztark v Drive Variety, Inc., 21 AD3d 876 [2005]).

To the extent the plaintiff argues that the Supreme Court should not have granted the defendant leave to serve a late answer, we note that the order appealed from did not grant such relief. Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siskin v. Cassar
122 A.D.3d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Fried v. Jacob Holding, Inc.
110 A.D.3d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Weinstein v. Schacht
98 A.D.3d 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
New Media Holding Co. v. Kagalovsky
97 A.D.3d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Zeccola & Selinger, LLC v. Harvey Horowitz
88 A.D.3d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.3d 697, 919 N.Y.S.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zanelli-v-jmm-raceway-llc-nyappdiv-2011.