Zanella v. Superior Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Zanella v. Superior Insurance Company

443 S.W.2d 95, 1969 Tex. App. LEXIS 2223

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 13, 1969

Docket4302

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 443 S.W.2d 95 (Zanella v. Superior Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zanella v. Superior Insurance Company, 443 S.W.2d 95, 1969 Tex. App. LEXIS 2223 (Tex. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Karen Elizabeth Zanella and Sharon Louise Zanella are the natural children of James H. Noland, Jr., deceased. During the lifetime of James H. Noland, Jr., said minor children were adopted by their mother’s second husband. Thereafter, No-land died under circumstances which, but for such adoption, would have entitled said minor children to receive workmen’s compensation death benefits. The trial court on stipulated facts rendered a summary judgment awarding such benefits to the father of the deceased workman and overruled the motion of his children for a summary judgment. The children have appealed.

The sole question presented is whether the father of the deceased, instead of his minor natural children is, because of their adoption, entitled to such *96 benefits. The question was decided by our Supreme Court in Patton v. Shamburger, 431 S.W.2d 506. There, as here, the question was whether workmen’s compensation death benefits should be paid to a deceased workman’s parent or to his minor children, who, before his death, had been adopted by another. The court held that such benefits are not obtained through inheritance but are conferred by statute. Article 8306, § 8a provides that such benefits shall be paid to a deceased workman’s “legal beneficiaries” but it does not say who the legal beneficiaries are and, since the adoption statute, Article 46a, Section 9, provides that when a child is adopted all legal relationship and all rights between such child and its natural parent shall cease and thereafter such child shall be deemed the child of its parent by adoption, it follows that after adoption said minors were no longer entitled to Workmen’s Compensation death benefits paid by reason of the death of their natural father.

We have carefully considered appellants’ able brief and argument and the authorities they cite. This case is not distinguishable from the Patton case and it is controlling. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Karen Elizabeth Zanella and Sharon Louise Zanella are the natural children of James H. Noland, Jr., deceased. During the lifetime of James H. Noland, Jr., said minor children were adopted by their mother’s second husband. Thereafter, No-land died under circumstances which, but for such adoption, would have entitled said minor children to receive workmen’s compensation death benefits. The trial court on stipulated facts rendered a summary judgment awarding such benefits to the father of the deceased workman and overruled the motion of his children for a summary judgment. The children have appealed.

The sole question presented is whether the father of the deceased, instead of his minor natural children is, because of their adoption, entitled to such *96 benefits. The question was decided by our Supreme Court in Patton v. Shamburger, 431 S.W.2d 506. There, as here, the question was whether workmen’s compensation death benefits should be paid to a deceased workman’s parent or to his minor children, who, before his death, had been adopted by another. The court held that such benefits are not obtained through inheritance but are conferred by statute. Article 8306, § 8a provides that such benefits shall be paid to a deceased workman’s “legal beneficiaries” but it does not say who the legal beneficiaries are and, since the adoption statute, Article 46a, Section 9, provides that when a child is adopted all legal relationship and all rights between such child and its natural parent shall cease and thereafter such child shall be deemed the child of its parent by adoption, it follows that after adoption said minors were no longer entitled to Workmen’s Compensation death benefits paid by reason of the death of their natural father.

We have carefully considered appellants’ able brief and argument and the authorities they cite. This case is not distinguishable from the Patton case and it is controlling. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 S.W.2d 95, 1969 Tex. App. LEXIS 2223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zanella-v-superior-insurance-company-texapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack