Zane Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 21, 2013·No. 03-12-00139-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 21, 2013

NO. 03-12-00139-CR

Zane Thomas, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s

judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment

of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zane Thomas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Zane Thomas v. State (Zane Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.