Zane Thomas v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 21, 2013
NO. 03-12-00139-CR
Zane Thomas, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being
considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s
judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment
of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and
unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified
below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zane Thomas v. State (Zane Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.