Zandieh v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

249 A.D.2d 553, 671 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 27, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 553 (Zandieh v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zandieh v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 249 A.D.2d 553, 671 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated April 26, 1996, confirming an order of the District Rent Administrator dated November 18, 1993, which determined that the apartment in question was subject to the Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR parts 2520-2530), the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), entered April 15, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The subject apartment was located in a 20-building, rent stabilized, multiple dwelling garden apartment complex which the petitioners bought in 1977. In 1985-1986 the petitioners converted the complex into independent buildings with less than six units, sold nine, and retained the remaining 11, including the building in which the subject apartment was located. Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, the respondent’s determination that the subject apartment remained rent regulated notwithstanding the post-conversion vacancy was neither irrational nor arbitrary and capricious (see, 9 NYCRR 2520.11 [d]; Matter of Shubert v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 162 AD2d 261).

We have considered the petitioners’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leung v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
266 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 553, 671 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zandieh-v-division-of-housing-community-renewal-nyappdiv-1998.