Zandian v. Margolin

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 2022
Docket82559
StatusPublished

This text of Zandian v. Margolin (Zandian v. Margolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zandian v. Margolin, (Neb. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

REZA ZANDIAN, A/K/A GOLAMREZA No. 82559 ZANDIANJAZI, A/K/A GHOLAM REZA ZANDIAN, A/K/A REZA JAZI, A/K/A J. REZA JAZI, A/K/A G. REZA JAZI, A/K/A GHONOREZA ZANDIAN JAZI, AN INDIVIDUAL, FILE Appellant, FEB 1 6 2022 vs. ELIZABETH A. BROWN JED MARGOLIN, AN 1NDIV[])UAL, CLERK OX SkilDREME COURT BY 5•Yr Res ondent. DEPUTYCLE A-174t

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order (the enforcement order) granting respondents Motion to Void Deeds, Assign Property, For Writ of Execution and To Convey, which respondent, Jed Margolin, filed to collect on his prior default judgment against appellant, Reza Zandian. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge. Respondent directly challenges the appealability of the enforcement order under any statute or rule. Appellant responds that the order is appealable as a special order after final judgment (SOAFJ) under NRAP 3A(b)(2). But, as appellant acknowledges, to be appealable as an SOAFJ, an order must "affect[ } the rights of some party to the action, growing out of the judgrnent previously entered." Gumrn v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 914, 59 P.3d 1220, 1221 (2002). Accordingly, post judgment orders that do not affect rights already incorporated in a judgment are not appealable as SOAFJs. Murray v. A Cab Taxi Serv. LLC, No. 81641, 2020 WL 6585946(Nev. November 9, 2020)(Order Dismissing Appeal). And here, Margolin's right to execute on his default judgment arises from the default judgment itself, not the subsequent enforcement order. Appellant having SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

in) 1947A 40114

e effectively conceded that no other statute or rule specifically provides for an appeal from the enforcement order, see Colton v. Murphy, 71 Nev. 71, 72, 279 P.2d 1036, 1036 (1955) (holding that a failure to challenge a point raised on appeal "constitutes a clear concession by appellants that there is merit in respondents position"), we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

• J. Silver

• J. Cadish

Pio&f. • J. Pickering

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP/Reno Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 an 1947A 4211D0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gumm v. Mainor
59 P.3d 1220 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2002)
Colton v. Murphy
279 P.2d 1036 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zandian v. Margolin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zandian-v-margolin-nev-2022.