Zamore v. Bar None Holding Co., LLC

73 A.D.3d 601, 900 N.Y.S.2d 644
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 73 A.D.3d 601 (Zamore v. Bar None Holding Co., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zamore v. Bar None Holding Co., LLC, 73 A.D.3d 601, 900 N.Y.S.2d 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered April 15, 2009, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleged that she sustained personal injuries when she was assaulted with a glass thrown unexpectedly by a disorderly patron in defendants’ bar as the patron was being escorted from the premises by defendants’ security personnel.

With the exception of a specific violation of the Dram Shop Acts, the standard of care for a nightclub operator is no different from the standard of care for any premises operator (D’Amico v Christie, 71 NY2d 76 [1987]). “Inasmuch as the incident was attributable to the sudden, unexpected and unforeseeable act of plaintiffs assailant, its prevention was beyond any duty defendant may have had as a landowner to its patrons” (Lewis v Jemanda N.Y. Corp., 277 AD2d 134 [2000]). The court thus properly dismissed the negligent security claim.

Liability under the Dram Shop Acts (General Obligations Law § 11-101 and Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65) “requires a commercial sale of alcohol” (D’Amico v Christie, 71 NY2d at 84). The claims based upon violation of the Dram Shop [602]*602Acts were also properly dismissed as there was no evidence that the assailant was served by an employee of the bar (as opposed to being handed a drink by another patron), that the assailant was visibly intoxicated at the time of the sale, or that the consumption of alcohol was the proximate cause of the assault (see e.g. Catania v 124 In-To-Go, Corp., 287 AD2d 476 [2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 699 [2002]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 3083KU).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Z-Live Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 03242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Hirsch v. Solares
2018 NY Slip Op 7828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Lebron v. Loco Noche, LLC
82 A.D.3d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.D.3d 601, 900 N.Y.S.2d 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zamore-v-bar-none-holding-co-llc-nyappdiv-2010.