Zamora v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co.

226 So. 3d 1085, 2017 WL 4399236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2017·No. No. 3D16-1917·Published

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, the plaintiffs below, appeal an order granting'final summary judgment in favor of their insurer, Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company. Upon Tower Hill’s commendable confession of error, and because genuine issues of material fact exist as to the amount of the actual cash value of the insured loss at hand, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See § 627.7011(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 3D16-1861, 225 So.3d 974, 977, 2017 WL 3722502, at *3 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 30, 2017); Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., 224 So.3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zamora v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co., 226 So. 3d 1085, 2017 WL 4399236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

226 So. 3d 1085 (Zamora v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co.
224 So. 3d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance Co.
225 So. 3d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)