Zamora v. Swift Transportation Corp.
This text of 319 F. App'x 333 (Zamora v. Swift Transportation Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Swift Transportation Corporation (Swift) appeals the denials of its motions to compel arbitration in three separate cases brought against it by former employees. The cases below came before three different district court judges, each of whom correctly concluded that the respective arbitration agreements at issue were illusory because Swift reserved the right to revoke or modify the agreements at any time without notice.1 Accordingly, Swift’s motions to compel arbitration were appropriately denied. AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
319 F. App'x 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zamora-v-swift-transportation-corp-ca5-2009.