Zamora and Fuentes v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co.
This text of Zamora and Fuentes v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co. (Zamora and Fuentes v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 4, 2017.
________________
No. 3D16-1917 Lower Tribunal No. 15-14888 ________________
Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, Appellants,
vs.
Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Perry & Neblett, P.A., and David A. Neblett and Jack Wynn, for appellants.
Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Berard Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM. Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, the plaintiffs below, appeal an order
granting final summary judgment in favor of their insurer, Tower Hill Prime
Insurance Company. Upon Tower Hill’s commendable confession of error, and
because genuine issues of material fact exist as to the amount of the actual cash
value of the insured loss at hand, we reverse the final summary judgment and
remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See § 627.7011(3)(a),
Fla. Stat. (2016); Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 3D16-1861, at *10-11
(Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 30, 2017); Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., 42 Fla. L.
Weekly D1565 (Fla. 3d DCA July 12, 2017).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zamora and Fuentes v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zamora-and-fuentes-v-tower-hill-prime-ins-co-fladistctapp-2017.