Zamlen-Spotts v. Cleveland State Univ.

2021 Ohio 3128
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zamlen-Spotts v. Cleveland State Univ.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2021 Ohio 2704
Ohio Court of Claims·Decided July 21, 2021·No. 2021-00087PQ·Published

Opinion

JUDY ZAMLEN-SPOTTS Case No. 2021-00087PQ

Requester Judge Patrick E. Sheeran

v. JUDGMENT ENTRY

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

Respondent

{¶1} On July 1, 2021, a Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends denying Requester’s claim for disclosure of requested records and assessing costs to Requester.

{¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the Report and Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, then this Court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.”

{¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation of July 1, 2021. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Judgment is rendered in favor of

Case No. 2021-00087PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

Respondent. Court costs are assessed to Requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK E. SHEERAN Judge

Filed July 21, 2021 Sent to S.C. Reporter 9/10/21

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zamlen-Spotts v. Cleveland State Univ., 2021 Ohio 3128 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2021).

2021 Ohio 3128 (Zamlen-Spotts v. Cleveland State Univ.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.