Zambroski v. Tofany

40 A.D.2d 885, 337 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3565
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 1, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 885 (Zambroski v. Tofany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zambroski v. Tofany, 40 A.D.2d 885, 337 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Appeal from a judg[886]*886ment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 24, 1970 in Cortland County, which set aside a determination revoking petitioner’s operator’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test following an arrest for driving while intoxicated. Petitioner was arrested on July 15, 1969 and charged with driving while intoxicated. The arresting officer testified that immediately after the arrest he asked petitioner if he would submit to a chemical test and that petitioner stated that he would not. He was then told that “for refusing to take the chemical test for intoxication, that he would be subject to be called to a Motor Vehicle hearing for his license could be suspended or revoked, whether or not he was convicted later on this charge”.' A short time thereafter, while in the Judge’s office, the officer again asked petitioner if he would submit to the chemical test and again he refused, although at that time no warnings were given. Subdivision.! of section 1194 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law requires that the officer must warn petitioner to the effect that a refusal to submit to a chemical test may result in the revocation of his license whether or not he is found guilty of the charge for which he was arrested. Petitioner was adequately apprised of the effect of his failure to take the test and there was substantial compliance with section 1194 which is all that is required (Matter of Connors v. Tofany, 37 A D 2d 402). Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Sweeney, Simons and Kane) JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruickshank v. Melton
82 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Jason v. Melton
60 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.2d 885, 337 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zambroski-v-tofany-nyappdiv-1972.