Home/New York Court of Appeals/Zambrana v. City of New York

Zambrana v. City of New York

727 N.E.2d 573, 94 N.Y.2d 887, 706 N.Y.S.2d 76, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 76
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 727 N.E.2d 573 (Zambrana v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zambrana v. City of New York, 727 N.E.2d 573, 94 N.Y.2d 887, 706 N.Y.S.2d 76, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 76 (N.Y. 2000).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laurent v. Town of Oyster Bay
2018 NY Slip Op 5028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Fader v. Town of Oyster Bay
113 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Roberts v. Boys & Girls Republic, Inc.
51 A.D.3d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ballan v. Arena Management Group, LLC
41 A.D.3d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Newcomb v. Guptill Holding Corp.
31 A.D.3d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Reid v. Druckman
309 A.D.2d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Kramer v. Arbore
309 A.D.2d 1208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Bleyer v. Recreational Management Service Corp.
289 A.D.2d 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Lozito v. City of New York
283 A.D.2d 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Vega v. County of Westchester
282 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Tinkham
273 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Engstrom v. City of New York
270 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
727 N.E.2d 573, 94 N.Y.2d 887, 706 N.Y.S.2d 76, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zambrana-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2000.