Zalaznick v. Imbembo
This text of 35 Misc. 2d 164 (Zalaznick v. Imbembo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 13 separate dispossess proceedings over a period of 21 months, a final order in favor of the landlord should have been granted. (See 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240; Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; Stern v. Harrold, 12 Misc 2d 73; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence, 14 Misc 2d 1070; Stern v. Carroll, 28 Misc 2d 507.)
The final order in favor of tenant should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed in favor of landlord, as prayed for in the petition, with costs.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Hoestadtbr and Tilzer, JJ.
Final order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 2d 164, 232 N.Y.S.2d 442, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zalaznick-v-imbembo-nyappterm-1962.