Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Department

475 F. App'x 805
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 29, 2012·No. 11-3033-cv·Unpublished·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Lisa Zalaski appeals from a June 29, 2011 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Bryant, J.) granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs sole claim, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that defendants violated her right to freedom of speech and assembly under the First Amendment at a demonstration held in October 2006. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the pertinent facts and procedural history.

Having previously remanded this case and given the parties a full opportunity to provide additional, relevant information that would illuminate the issues on appeal, see Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Dep’t, 613 F.3d 336, 337 (2d Cir.2010) (per curiam), and upon our de novo review of the instant record, we find no material error that would cause us to reverse. See McGullam v. Cedar Graphics, Inc., 609 F.3d 70, 75 (2d Cir.2010). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Department, 475 F. App'x 805 (2d Cir. 2012).

475 F. App'x 805 (Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonnell v. City & County of Denver
238 F. Supp. 3d 1279 (D. Colorado, 2017)
Ball v. City of Lincoln
197 F. Supp. 3d 1177 (D. Nebraska, 2016)
Zalaski v. City of Hartford
723 F.3d 382 (Second Circuit, 2013)