ZAKKA v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

ZAKKA v. State

359 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2012 WL 612466

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2012

DocketWD 73366

StatusPublished

This text of 359 S.W.3d 564 (ZAKKA v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ZAKKA v. State, 359 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2012 WL 612466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Zakka appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. Zakka argues that the motion court erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. More specifically, Zakka claims that his trial counsel improperly advised him regarding the State’s plea offer, and as a result of that improper advice, Zakka pleaded guilty to the class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree. We affii'm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Zakka appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. Zakka argues that the motion court erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. More specifically, Zakka claims that his trial counsel improperly advised him regarding the State’s plea offer, and as a result of that improper advice, Zakka pleaded guilty to the class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree. We affii'm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2012 WL 612466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zakka-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack