ZAKKA v. State
359 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2012 WL 612466
Opinion
ORDER
Elijah Zakka appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. Zakka argues that the motion court erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. More specifically, Zakka claims that his trial counsel improperly advised him regarding the State’s plea offer, and as a result of that improper advice, Zakka pleaded guilty to the class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree. We affii'm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ZAKKA v. State, 359 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2012 WL 612466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
359 S.W.3d 564 (ZAKKA v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. JDH
359 S.W.3d 564 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)