Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc.

640 So. 2d 1223, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7764, 1994 WL 406743

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1901

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 640 So. 2d 1223 (Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc., 640 So. 2d 1223, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7764, 1994 WL 406743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The appellant, Rifaat Zak-hary, appeals the entry of a final judgment after a non-jury trial in favor of Martin, U.S.A., Inc. There was no court reporter present to provide a transcript of the trial and the parties did not prepare a stipulated statement pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or a statement of the evidence or the proceedings pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Since the decision of the trial court is presumed correct and Zakhary has the burden of demonstrating error, the failure to provide a record of the trial proceedings is fatal to his case. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The appellant, Rifaat Zak-hary, appeals the entry of a final judgment after a non-jury trial in favor of Martin, U.S.A., Inc. There was no court reporter present to provide a transcript of the trial and the parties did not prepare a stipulated statement pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or a statement of the evidence or the proceedings pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Since the decision of the trial court is presumed correct and Zakhary has the burden of demonstrating error, the failure to provide a record of the trial proceedings is fatal to his case. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

640 So. 2d 1223, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7764, 1994 WL 406743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zakhary-v-martin-usa-inc-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack