Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc.

640 So. 2d 1223, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7764, 1994 WL 406743
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1994·No. No. 93-1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The appellant, Rifaat Zak-hary, appeals the entry of a final judgment after a non-jury trial in favor of Martin, U.S.A., Inc. There was no court reporter present to provide a transcript of the trial and the parties did not prepare a stipulated statement pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or a statement of the evidence or the proceedings pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Since the decision of the trial court is presumed correct and Zakhary has the burden of demonstrating error, the failure to provide a record of the trial proceedings is fatal to his case. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc., 640 So. 2d 1223, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7764, 1994 WL 406743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 1223 (Zakhary v. Martin U.S.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durham v. McNair
659 So. 2d 1291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)