Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Zajc v. Hycomp

Zajc v. Hycomp

876 N.E.2d 968, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1409
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 2007
Docket2007-1358
StatusPublished

This text of 876 N.E.2d 968 (Zajc v. Hycomp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zajc v. Hycomp, 876 N.E.2d 968, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88421, 172 Ohio App.3d 117, 2007-Ohio-2637. Discretionary appeal accepted.

O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Nancy L. Heilman by Keith A. Ashmus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ZAJC v. Hycomp, Inc.
873 N.E.2d 337 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
876 N.E.2d 968, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zajc-v-hycomp-ohio-2007.