Zaira S. Azocar v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided June 10, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-02969·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-02969-ODW-SK Document 67 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:388

1 Scott D. Cunningham (State Bar No.: 200413) Email: scunningham@condonlaw.com 2 Justin M. Schmidt (State Bar No.: 309656) Email: jschmidt@condonlaw.com 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1050 4 Los Angeles, California 90067-6036 Telephone: (310) 557-2030 5 Facsimile: (310) 557-1299

6 Attorneys for Defendant AEROVÍAS DE MÉXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 7

11 ZAIRA S. LLANCAN AZOCAR, ) Case No. 2:21-cv-02969-ODW-SK ) 12 Plaintiff, ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ) ORDER 13 vs. ) ) 14 DELTA AIR LINES, INC.; GRUPO ) AEROMEXICO; AEROVIAS DE ) 15 MEXICO, S/A/ DE C.V. dba ) Aeromexico Airlines and DOES 1 ) 16 through 50, Inclusive, ) ) 17 Defendants. ) ) 18 )

19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 22 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 23 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 24 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 25 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 26 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 27 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 28 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-02969-ODW-SK LAOFFICE 280074V.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-02969-ODW-SK LAOFFICE 280074V.1 PLL HTYSROF & NODNOC 0501 etiuS ,sratS eht fo eunevA 1091 6306-76009 ainrofilaC ,selegnA soL 0302-755 )013( :enohpeleT Case 2:21-cv-02969-ODW-SK Document 67 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 14 Page ID #:389 in Section 12.3 (Filing Protected Material), below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to a file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve private, confidential, personal, medical, HIPPA protected, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, HIPPA protected medical information, confidential and proprietary airline operations and training manuals and materials, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, , information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zaira S. Azocar v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Zaira S. Azocar v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Zaira S. Azocar v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.