Zaid v. Bush

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 20, 2013
DocketCivil Action No. 2005-1646
StatusPublished

This text of Zaid v. Bush (Zaid v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zaid v. Bush, (D.D.C. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE UNI'I`ED STATES OF DISTRICT C()URT FOR THE DIS'I`RICT OF C()LUMBIA

WALEED SAEED BN SAEED ZAID (ISN 550),

Petitioiier, CiviI Action No. {)S-CV-1646 (JDB) v. `

BARACK H. QBAMA, er ai.,

Respondents.

‘*-J'\»/\\.»/"-¢..d'\»_d\~»_/\.o*'-J\-J\¢»/\¢/\¢.¢/

S'I`IPULATI()N AND ORDER Upon consideration of the Stipuiated Motion for Voluntary Dismiss'al Without Prej udice and for Continued Access Pursuant to the Protective Order, it is hereby STIPULATED and

()RDERED that:

l. Petitioner Waleed Saeed Bn Saeed Zaid’s (ISN 550) Pctition for a Writ ot" I~labeas Corpus is hereby I)ISMISSED without prejudice to his right to re-tile such a petition at any time.

2. This dismissal without prejudice does not waive, and shall not be construed as a waiver oi", any ground for relief that Petitioner may currently have, and Respondents will not contend otherwise it`a petition is re-i'iled.

3. The Protective Order and Procedures for Counsel Access to Detainees at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, issued by judge Hogan on Septe:nber l l, 2008, in fn re Guam'arwamo Bay Detainee L:`Iigatz`on, No. 08-MC~442 ("I`FI

entered in this case (D|

and continue to govern Petitioner Zaid’s access to counsel while he remains confined at Guantaiianio Bay and has the right to seek further relief by habeas corpus, whether or not he actually continues to have a petition pending before the Court.

4. This Stipulation and Order is without prejudice to the parties’ rights to seek to set aside, modify or otherwise obtain relief from any provision herein or of the Protective Order on any ground that could be or could have been raised at any time, except that Respondents may not raise any objection or argument based on waiver as described in paragraph 2 above.

5. The Coui't shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Stipulation and Order.

SO ORI)ERED.

irc rla/a

Joli_;i D. Bates, United States District judge

Mayg@, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zaid v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaid-v-bush-dcd-2013.