Zahringer v. Zahringer, No. Fa 94-0138873 S (Mar. 24, 2000)
This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3854 (Zahringer v. Zahringer, No. Fa 94-0138873 S (Mar. 24, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties further agreed that either party may petition the court for a review of the unallocated order, asking the court to consider the totality of the financial circumstances of the parties and apply §
The plaintiff was and is a homemaker and full time care giver for the parties' three children. She has relocated to Florida.
At the time of the dissolution the defendant was employed by Bear Stearns on commission and is still so employed as a Senior Managing Director. His annual income then was $1,339,503. His annual income currently is $2,227,000. The court finds this increase to be a substantial change in the financial circumstances of the defendant. This conclusion permits the court to apply the §
The parties filed a stipulation that the defendant's gross monthly income in 1999 is $185,600 as per his financial CT Page 3856 affidavit. His net monthly after taxes is $114,700.
The defendant introduced 98 pages containing copies of 3 checks per page, of a checking account in First Union National Bank, to demonstrate that the plaintiff has access to her parents funds for her use and for the children's needs. The defendant cites inUnkelbach v. McNary,
The defendant is ordered to pay the sum of $50,000 monthly to the plaintiff as unallocated alimony and child support, effective as of January 1, 1999 pursuant to paragraph 3.5 of the parties' separation agreement. The court issues a wage withholding order pursuant to statute. Since the new order is retroactive and creates an arrearage, it shall be paid in monthly installments of $37,500 until paid in full, commencing April 15, 2000.
HARRIGAN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3854, 26 Conn. L. Rptr. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zahringer-v-zahringer-no-fa-94-0138873-s-mar-24-2000-connsuperct-2000.