Zahringer v. Zahringer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Zahringer v. Zahringer

806 A.2d 50, 261 Conn. 909, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 309

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 17, 2002·No. SC 16795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 251 (AC 20687), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s order modifying the unallocated alimony and child support award?”

[910]*910The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16795. Wesley W. Horton, Daniel J. Krisch, Samuel V. Schoonmáker IV and Thomas D. Colin, in support of the petition. Gary I. Cohen, in opposition. Decided July 17, 2002

SULLIVAN, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 251 (AC 20687), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s order modifying the unallocated alimony and child support award?”

[910]*910The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16795. Wesley W. Horton, Daniel J. Krisch, Samuel V. Schoonmáker IV and Thomas D. Colin, in support of the petition. Gary I. Cohen, in opposition. Decided July 17, 2002

SULLIVAN, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Zahringer v. Zahringer, 806 A.2d 50, 261 Conn. 909, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 309 (Colo. 2002).

Pincite

806 A.2d 50 (Zahringer v. Zahringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related