Zahra Afianian v. Elaine Duke

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedNovember 6, 2019
Docket2:17-cv-07643-FMO-RAO
StatusUnknown

This text of Zahra Afianian v. Elaine Duke (Zahra Afianian v. Elaine Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zahra Afianian v. Elaine Duke, (C.D. Cal. 2019).

Opinion

YOLANDA C. RONDON 1

2 ATOOSA VAKILI 3 Law Office of Atoosa Vakili

4 ROSELINE FERAL 5 Law Office of Roseline D. Feral

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General 9 WILLIAM C. PEACHEY 10 Director LAUREN FASCETT 11 Senior Litigation Counsel 12 WILLIAM H. WEILAND 13 JOSEPH F. CARILLI, JR. Trial Attorneys 14

15 Attorneys for Defendants

16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ZAHRA AFIANIAN, 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-07643-FMO-RAO

19 Plaintiff, (PROPOSED) STIPULATED 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 21

22 KEVIN MCALEENAN, et al.,

23 Defendants. 24 25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Discovery in this Action is likely to involve production of private 27 information of non-parties to this litigation and of information designated as for- 28 official-use-only for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 1 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 2 Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 3 following Stipulated Protective Order (hereinafter “Order”). The Parties 4 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 5 or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 6 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 7 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 8 1.1 Good Cause Statement. This Action is likely to involve the production 9 of information normally protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 10 § 552a, information normally protected from release under the Freedom of 11 Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and information designated as limited official use 12 or official use only, or information otherwise protected from disclosure under state 13 or federal statutes, federal regulations, court rules, case decisions, or common law, 14 for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose 15 other than prosecution of this Action is warranted. For example, in addition to 16 information covered by the Privacy Act, the Action may involve information 17 protected by 8 U.S.C. § 1367(a)(2) or 8 C.F.R. § 208.6. Accordingly, to expedite 18 the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over 19 confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties 20 are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable, 21 necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to 22 address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a 23 protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of 24 the Parties that information will not be withheld from disclosure or designated as 25 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so withheld or designated 26 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 27 manner. 28 1 Information covered under this Order shall be separated into three 2 categories: 3 Category 1. Personal privacy information of third parties contained in a Form I- 4 130, Petition for Alien Relative, a document submitted in support of an applicant’s 5 Form I-130 Petition, and a decision by the United States Citizenship and 6 Immigration Services (“USCIS”) on an application for an immigration benefit, to 7 include: 8 (a) names; 9 (b) address; 10 (c) telephone number; 11 (d) birth date; 12 (e) social security number, other personal identification number, 13 tax identification number, alien registration number (“A number”), complete 14 petition receipt numbers, passport number, driver license number, and any similar 15 identifier assigned to an individual by the federal government, a state or local 16 government of the United States, or the government of any other country; 17 (f) any other information that, either alone or in association with 18 other related information, would allow the identification of the particular 19 individual(s) to whom the information relates; 20 (g) bank account numbers, credit card numbers, and other financial 21 information that can be specifically linked to an individual’s or entity’s financial 22 account; 23 (h) medical information, such as medical records, medical 24 treatment, and medical diagnoses; 25 (i) information covered under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 26 and Local Civil Rule 5.2(a); 27 (j) information routinely protected from release under the Freedom 28 of Information Act Exemption 6, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6); and 1 (k) any information protected or restricted from disclosure by a 2 state or federal statute or regulation, but which the Court may order produced, such 3 as information protected from disclosure by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and 4 other statutes or regulations that may prevent disclosure of specific information 5 related to noncitizens, including but not limited to: 8 U.S.C. §§ 1160(b)(5), (6); 6 1186A(c)(4), 1202(f), 1254a(c)(6), 1255a(c)(4), (5); 1304(b), and 1367(a)(2), (b), 7 (c), (d); 22 U.S.C. § 7105(c)(1)(C); 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.6, 210.2(e), 214.11, 214.14(e), 8 216.5(e)(3)(viii), 236.6, 244.16, 245a.2(t), 245a.3(n), 245a.21, 1003.27(b)-(d), 9 1003.46, and 1208.6, which otherwise could subject either party to civil or criminal 10 penalties or other sanctions in the event of unauthorized disclosure. 11 Category 2. Foreign Language documents submitted by an applicant in support of a 12 Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative. 13 Category 3. Information designated as limited-official-use or for-official-use-only 14 information contained in a federal agency policy, memorandum, instruction, or 15 training presentation or guide, to include: 16 (a) information compiled for law enforcement purposes, including 17 but not limited to, techniques related to the integrity of the legal immigration 18 system, indicators used to identify suspected or known fraud, criminal activity, 19 public safety, or national security; 20 (b) information routinely withheld from release under the Freedom 21 of Information Act Exemption 7C, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C); and 22 (c) information designated as sensitive but unclassified or 23 designated as a category of controlled unclassified information. 24 1.2 Acknowledgment of Procedure for Filing Under Seal. The Parties 25 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Order does not entitle 26 them to file confidential information under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth 27 the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 28 Party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 1 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 2 proceedings and records in civil cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zahra Afianian v. Elaine Duke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zahra-afianian-v-elaine-duke-cacd-2019.