Zahoranski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zahoranski v. State

578 So. 2d 900, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4469, 1991 WL 71551

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1680

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 900 (Zahoranski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zahoranski v. State, 578 So. 2d 900, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4469, 1991 WL 71551 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of entry of an amended judgment which reflects that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere rather than a plea of guilty; and entry of an amended order of revocation which reflects the trial court’s determination that appellant violated his probation only by violating condition (3) thereof, rather than the several violations erroneously contained therein.

ANSTEAD, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of entry of an amended judgment which reflects that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere rather than a plea of guilty; and entry of an amended order of revocation which reflects the trial court’s determination that appellant violated his probation only by violating condition (3) thereof, rather than the several violations erroneously contained therein.

ANSTEAD, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 900, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4469, 1991 WL 71551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zahoranski-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.