Zagorski v. Mays

Sixth Circuit

Zagorski v. Mays

907 F.3d 912

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 30, 2018

DocketNo. 18-6052

StatusPublished

This text of 907 F.3d 912 (Zagorski v. Mays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zagorski v. Mays, 907 F.3d 912 (6th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes *913that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Chief Judge Cole would adhere to his original dissent.

The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petition is denied

Further, the motion for stay of execution is also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes *913that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Chief Judge Cole would adhere to his original dissent.

The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petition is denied

Further, the motion for stay of execution is also denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

907 F.3d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zagorski-v-mays-ca6-2018.