Zagorski v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zagorski v. County of Suffolk

196 A.D.2d 816, 602 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8448

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 13, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 816 (Zagorski v. County of Suffolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zagorski v. County of Suffolk, 196 A.D.2d 816, 602 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated June 14, 1991, which granted the motion of the defendant Harborfield Central School District, sued herein as Suffolk County School District No. 6, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to file their notice of claim and complaint nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the plaintiffs failed to file a timely notice of claim and failed to make an application to serve a late notice of claim within the one-year 90-day Statute of Limitations period, the Supreme Court correctly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the Harborfield Central School District, sued herein as Suffolk County School District No. 6 (see, Education Law § 3813 [2]; General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; [5]; § 50-i; Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated June 14, 1991, which granted the motion of the defendant Harborfield Central School District, sued herein as Suffolk County School District No. 6, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to file their notice of claim and complaint nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the plaintiffs failed to file a timely notice of claim and failed to make an application to serve a late notice of claim within the one-year 90-day Statute of Limitations period, the Supreme Court correctly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the Harborfield Central School District, sued herein as Suffolk County School District No. 6 (see, Education Law § 3813 [2]; General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; [5]; § 50-i; Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 816, 602 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zagorski-v-county-of-suffolk-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack