ZAGAMI v. Cottrell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

ZAGAMI v. Cottrell

966 A.2d 1075, 198 N.J. 309

DecidedFebruary 4, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 966 A.2d 1075 (ZAGAMI v. Cottrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ZAGAMI v. Cottrell, 966 A.2d 1075, 198 N.J. 309 (N.J. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

966 A.2d 1075 (2009) 198 N.J. 309

ZAGAMI, LLC, d/b/a the Landmark Americana TAP and Grill, d/b/a Landmark Liquors, Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
Mary Ann COTTRELL and Luis Perez, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 4, 2009.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 A.2d 1075, 198 N.J. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zagami-v-cottrell-nj-2009.

Opinion

ZAGAMI, LLC, d/b/a the Landmark Americana TAP and Grill, d/b/a Landmark Liquors, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Mary Ann COTTRELL and Luis Perez, Defendants-Respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

ZAGAMI, LLC, d/b/a the Landmark Americana TAP and Grill, d/b/a Landmark Liquors, Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
Mary Ann COTTRELL and Luis Perez, Defendants-Respondents.