Zafora v. State

900 So. 2d 675, 2005 WL 840519
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 2005
Docket3D05-106
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 900 So. 2d 675 (Zafora v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zafora v. State, 900 So. 2d 675, 2005 WL 840519 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

900 So.2d 675 (2005)

Luis Manuel ZAFORA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D05-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 13, 2005.
Rehearing Denied May 11, 2005.

Luis Manuel Zafora, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William J. Selinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GREEN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (a claim of insufficient notice of intent to habitualize must be raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion within two years of the conviction becoming final).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ives v. State
993 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Jackson v. State
921 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Mingo v. State
907 So. 2d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Adams v. State
906 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Daily v. State
905 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
900 So. 2d 675, 2005 WL 840519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zafora-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.