Zafora v. State
900 So. 2d 675, 2005 WL 840519
Opinion
Luis Manuel ZAFORA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Luis Manuel Zafora, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William J. Selinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GREEN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (a claim of insufficient notice of intent to habitualize must be raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion within two years of the conviction becoming final).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zafora v. State, 900 So. 2d 675, 2005 WL 840519 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
900 So. 2d 675 (Zafora v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ives v. State
993 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Jackson v. State
921 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Mingo v. State
907 So. 2d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Adams v. State
906 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Daily v. State
905 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)