Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedJune 11, 2021
Docket8:19-cv-01236
StatusUnknown

This text of Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC (Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. CLARISSA ZAFIROV,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:19-cv-1236-T-KKM-SPF

FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES LLC, et al.,

Defendants. _______________________________________/

ORDER The defendants move to stay discovery pending an order on their motions to dismiss. (Docs. 43, 52). Relator Clarissa Zafirov opposes the defendants’ motions. (Doc. 58). For good cause, the court may stay discovery to protect parties from annoyance, undue burden, or expense. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); Panola Land Buyers Ass’n v. Shuman, 762 F.2d 1550, 1558–59 (11th Cir. 1985). Before allowing discovery to begin, district courts should attempt to resolve motions to dismiss to avoid unnecessary costs to litigants and the court. See Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353, 1367–68 (11th Cir. 1997). This case, an unsealed action under the False Claims Act, was reassigned to the undersigned. The defendants’ motions to dismiss were pending for months before the undersigned inherited this case, and the parties may very well have proceeded with discovery in the absence of a ruling on the stay motions. However, the Court finds good cause to stay discovery until an order on the defendants’ motions to dismiss is entered. Staying discovery will avoid expending the parties’ resources and judicial resources on possible discovery disputes while the Court decides the motions to dismiss. And a stay will allow the undersigned to better manage this inherited case. See Ortega Trujillo v. Conover €» Co. Comme’ns Inc., 221 F.3d 1262, 1264 (11th Cir. 2000) (‘A stay sometimes is authorized simply as a means of controlling the district court’s docket and of managing cases before the district court.”). The defendants’ motions to stay discovery (Docs. 43, 52) are GRANTED. Discovery is STAYED pending an order on the defendants’ motions to dismiss. Within

ten days of the Court’s order on the defendants’ motion to dismiss, the parties must

meet and confer for the purpose of preparing and filing an amended Case Management Report. The amended Case Management Report must be filed on the docket within five days of the parties’ meeting. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on June 11, 2021.

Jahn Kila Maryele KathryrY Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.
123 F.3d 1353 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Panola Land Buyers Ass'n v. Shuman
762 F.2d 1550 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zafirov-v-florida-medical-associates-llc-flmd-2021.