Zaffuto v. City of Hammond

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zaffuto v. City of Hammond. Read the opinion of the Court — 308 F.3d 485
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2002·No. 01-31405·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30935 consolidated with No. 01-31405

TERRY ZAFFUTO; SUSAN ZAFFUTO,

Plaintiffs - Appellees-Cross-Appellants versus

CITY OF HAMMOND; ET AL,

Defendants

CITY OF HAMMOND,

Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees; KENNY CORKERN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

November 18, 2002

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Because the underlying opinion, Zaffuto v. City of Hammond, 308

F.3d 485 (5th Cir. 2002), reverses in part and remands for a new

trial, the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to plaintiffs

is VACATED. On remand, the district court shall, at the appropriate

time, re-determine whether and to what extent the plaintiffs are

entitled to attorney’s fees. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zaffuto v. City of Hammond, (5th Cir. 2002).

Zaffuto v. City of Hammond (Zaffuto v. City of Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zaffuto v. City of Hammond
308 F.3d 485 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)