Zackery v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Zackery v. State

161 So. 924, 26 Ala. App. 706

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 1935

Docket4 Div. 137.

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 924 (Zackery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zackery v. State, 161 So. 924, 26 Ala. App. 706 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

On conviction the defendant was fined $50, for which he was sentenced twenty days and the court fixed an additional punishment of five months’ hard labor. There is no definite sentence .to pay the costs and that part of the sentence is void. There is no error of a reversible nature in the record, and the judgment and sentence fixing the punishment at five months and twenty days is in all things affirmed.

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

On conviction the defendant was fined $50, for which he was sentenced twenty days and the court fixed an additional punishment of five months’ hard labor. There is no definite sentence .to pay the costs and that part of the sentence is void. There is no error of a reversible nature in the record, and the judgment and sentence fixing the punishment at five months and twenty days is in all things affirmed.

Affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 So. 924, 26 Ala. App. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zackery-v-state-alactapp-1935.