Zack v. Tucker

Eleventh Circuit

Zack v. Tucker

678 F.3d 1203, 2012 WL 1473430, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8838

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 2012

Docket09-12717

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 678 F.3d 1203 (Zack v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zack v. Tucker, 678 F.3d 1203, 2012 WL 1473430, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8838 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 F.3d 1203, 2012 WL 1473430, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zack-v-tucker-ca11-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack