Zack v. State

260 S.W. 1044, 97 Tex. Crim. 103
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 12, 1924·No. No. 8175.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception. We have examined the facts as given in testimony and they are amply sufficient to support the conclusion of guilt arrived at by the jury.

No error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zack v. State, 260 S.W. 1044, 97 Tex. Crim. 103 (Tex. 1924).

260 S.W. 1044 (Zack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eubank v. State
286 S.W. 234 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)