Zack v. State

260 S.W. 1044, 97 Tex. Crim. 103
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 12, 1924
DocketNo. 8175.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W. 1044 (Zack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zack v. State, 260 S.W. 1044, 97 Tex. Crim. 103 (Tex. 1924).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception. We have examined the facts as given in testimony and they are amply sufficient to support the conclusion of guilt arrived at by the jury.

No error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eubank v. State
286 S.W. 234 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W. 1044, 97 Tex. Crim. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zack-v-state-texcrimapp-1924.