Zack v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zack v. Cohen

160 A.D. 902, 144 N.Y.S. 1151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D. 902 (Zack v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zack v. Cohen, 160 A.D. 902, 144 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed as against the defendant' Cohén, with costs; judgment and order as against the defendants Simon and Louis Halperin reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence that those two defendants were the owners of the premises or in possession and control of the premises alleged to have been negligently maintained. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed as against the defendant' Cohén, with costs; judgment and order as against the defendants Simon and Louis Halperin reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence that those two defendants were the owners of the premises or in possession and control of the premises alleged to have been negligently maintained. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D. 902, 144 N.Y.S. 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zack-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1913.