Zachry v. State
259 Ark. 42
Opinions
After denying appellant’s application to file in this Court a supplemental transcript of the sentencing of Charles Watson Bean, an acknowledged accomplice that testified on behalf of the State at appellant’s trial, appellant filed a petition for reconsideration or a request in the alternative for us to reinvest the trial court with jurisdiction to hear the matter. We are granting appellant’s alternative request upon the condition that she promptly make application to the trial court within 30 days from the date hereof for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zachry v. State, 259 Ark. 42 (Ark. 1975).
259 Ark. 42 (Zachry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gross v. State
412 S.W.2d 279 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1967)
Delaney v. State
207 S.W.2d 37 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1948)
Hayes v. State
277 S.W. 36 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1925)
Norrid v. State
63 S.W.2d 526 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1933)
State v. Neil
71 S.W.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1934)
Therman v. State
168 S.W.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1943)
Foster v. State
45 Ark. 328 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1885)
Incorporated Town of Corning v. Thompson
168 S.W. 128 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)
Thomas v. State
206 S.W. 435 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
State v. Martineau
232 S.W. 609 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1921)
Cooper v. State
438 S.W.2d 681 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1969)