Zachery Halsell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 30, 2010·No. 02-10-00280-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00326-CR

CHRISTOPHER G. NATALE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 6 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss.” Although appellant

has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate

procedure, appellant's attorney indicated in writing in an affidavit for diligent

search received in this court on December 8, 2010, that appellant no longer

wishes to pursue his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We suspend rule 42.2(a)’s

requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. App. P. 2. No decision of this court having been delivered before we received

this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 30, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zachery Halsell v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Zachery Halsell v. State (Zachery Halsell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.