Zachery Halsell v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00326-CR
CHRISTOPHER G. NATALE APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 6 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------
We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss.” Although appellant
has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate
procedure, appellant's attorney indicated in writing in an affidavit for diligent
search received in this court on December 8, 2010, that appellant no longer
wishes to pursue his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We suspend rule 42.2(a)’s
requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. App. P. 2. No decision of this court having been delivered before we received
this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 30, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zachery Halsell v. State (Zachery Halsell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.