Zacher v. Stent
This text of 8 Conn. Supp. 275 (Zacher v. Stent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A consideration of the motion for more specific statement, in connection with the allegations of the complaint, reveals a lack of merit in the motion. The idea of proceedings before trial is to permit a party to fairly prepare his case and avoid surprises.
Here it appears that the defendant received a deed, and, if he has lost it, any details can be obtained at the town clerk’s office. In addition, it is alleged he was a party to an agreement with his deceased brother. These two instruments give 'him all the information he now seeks with sufficient exactitude, and anything else sought by him in the motion is, at the most, evidential.
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Conn. Supp. 275, 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zacher-v-stent-connsuperct-1940.