Zacher v. Michael
474 N.E.2d 1195, 64 N.Y.2d 686, 485 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4913
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the determination made by respondent is supported by substantial evidence.
[688]*688Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zacher v. Michael, 474 N.E.2d 1195, 64 N.Y.2d 686, 485 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4913 (N.Y. 1984).
474 N.E.2d 1195 (Zacher v. Michael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
For the People Theatres of N.Y., Inc. v. City of New York
27 Misc. 3d 1079 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Goldman v. Crotty
126 A.D.2d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)