Zachary Will Brenner v. Heather Shirley, et al.

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: September 12, 2025
• Docket: 1:24-cv-00545
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARY WILL BRENNER, Case No.: 1:24-cv-000545-KES-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY 13 v. AND SCHEDULING ORDER 14 HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., (Doc. 28) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Zachary Will Brenner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 19 conditions of confinement claims against Defendants Shirley, Cronjager, and DeGough. 20 On June 25, 2025, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order, (Doc. 24), and 21 the deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary judgment motion was set for September 25, 22 2025 (Id). 23 On September 9, 2025, Defendants filed Ex Parte Application to Modify the Discovery 24 and Scheduling Order, seeking to extend the deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary 25 judgment motion to November 24, 2025. (Doc. 28.) 26 II. DISCUSSION 27 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation & internal 1 quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good 2 cause and with the judge's consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if 3 it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic v. 4 Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Johnson, 975 F.2d 5 at 607). 6 Defendants seek an extension of the deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary 7 judgment motion. Recently, the parties agreed to reschedule Plaintiff’s noticed deposition to 8 October 21, 2025, after originally setting it in early September 2025, at Plaintiff’s request. 9 Because Plaintiff’s deposition is now scheduled to occur after the exhaustion motion deadline, 10 Defendants seek a 60-day extension of that deadline. 11 Good cause exists to extend the deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary 12 judgment motion. 13 III. CONCLUSION AND ORDER 14 Based on the foregoing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 15 1. Defendants’ request to modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order (Doc. 28) is 16 GRANTED; 17 2. The deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary judgment motion is 18 EXTENDED from September 25, 2025, to November 24, 2025; and 19 3. No other deadlines are affected by this Order. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21

22 Dated: September 12, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23

24 25 26 27